Jeffrey Tao's Travel Impressions
Footloose in Seoul Preconceptions Over the years I had heard many reactions from those who had visited or lived in Seoul, and they were not enthusiastic, for the most part. American expatriates who had corporate postings there seemed not to have enjoyed the time that they spent there. Not only did they find the language barrier formidable, they also found Seoul less open and convenient than Hong Kong, and less sophisticated and fashionable than Tokyo. Among short-term visitors, some of my Chinese colleagues tended to see it as an unimpressive amalgam of Chinese and Japanese cultural and architectural features and felt that the Korean capital had neither the magnificent monumental palaces of Beijing nor the sleek, high-tech modernity of Tokyo. All of this piqued my curiosity, so when I had the opportunity in April 1999 to route my flight through Seoul on my way back to New York from my Bangkok assignment, I decided to stay 2 days. Re-entering the Developed World Arriving on a flight from Bangkok at Seoul airport and emerging from the terminal, I suddenly felt that I was back again in the developed world. That does not mean to say that other Asian countries like Thailand or China had not made tremendous economic strides in recent years. But getting into the city itself was something pleasant, comfortable and altogether safe. There was an airport bus that took passengers to major downtown hotels following 4 or 5 different routes (that reminds one of Tokyo airport, but the price here is only $5 versus $20 in Tokyo.) In Vientiane, I had to be picked up by the hotel in an SUV and driven to my hotel over unpaved roads. In Bangkok, I took a metered taxi from the airport but the driver, as soon as he got on the highway, turned off the meter and offered me a flat rate, which I had to accept, because I had no way of getting other transportation on the highway. So I was grateful this time for this convenient, modern touch. The bus, after stopping at a number of hotels on the way, eventually dropped me off at the Sofitel Ambassador Hotel in the heart of downtown Seoul. I was glad to be finally arriving, and after settling into my cozy and pleasingly-appointed room, I threw open one of the windows, drank in the cool evening breeze and looked down at the teeming, neon-lit city below, busy with traffic still. The Allure of Seoul’s Palaces There’s no doubt that for any visitor to the Korean capital, its palaces are the main attraction. So bright and early the next morning, after a hearty breakfast, I headed straight for the guest relations manager’s desk in the lobby to get some help on how to reach the palaces. She very helpfully wrote down the name of Kyongbokkung Palace in Korean on the hotel’s business card, on the reverse side of which was printed the name of the Sofitel Ambassador in Korean and a small road map indicating its location. Armed with this card, I felt invincible and ran out of the hotel entrance to the taxi stand, where a row of polished black taxis was in attendance. I handed the card to the driver, and said “Kyongbokkung Palace, please!” He smiled, repeated the same words approvingly and opened the door for me. It was a beautiful spring day. The car glided through busy downtown, but all around us were trees with tender-green leaves and hosts and hosts of flowers in bloom and ablaze with color. I was elated and luxuriated in the comfortable upholstered seats.
Viewing Korean palaces invites comparisons with Chinese palaces. The layout of Kyongbokkung palace is on a north-south axis, much like the Forbidden Palace in Beijing. The word “kung” in Korean is exactly the same word as in Chinese, meaning simply “palace” and is even written and pronounced the same way in the two languages. So it would make more sense to say Kyongbok Palace and omit the “kung” or simply say Kyongbokkung when referring to the palace.
Another interesting and possibly unique feature of Kyongbok Palace is the Terrace for Measuring the Wind. This is an ornately carved raised stone terrace with a hole drilled into it, in which is inserted a flag-pole, and the flag was used to determine both the direction and the intensity of the wind. These devices apparently go back several centuries, and I don’t remember seeing them in China or Japan or anywhere else in the world. The Elegant Simplicity of Changdokkung
Royal scene being filmed in Changdok Palace Insadong Our tour guide put it this way, “During the colonial period ( Japanese occupation of Korea, 1910-1945), noblemen could not make a living, so they started selling their art objects and precious possessions, and they did so in this district of Insadong, which eventually evolved to become Seoul’s antique district.” It has a whole street lined with art galleries and shops mostly selling ceramics, paintings, calligraphy and different kinds of souvenirs. Some shops also sell furniture such as Korean clothes chests and medicine cabinets made out of wood with metal fixtures. Authenticity and pricing could be problematic in such a touristy neighborhood. There are also shops which specialize in brushes, brush-pots, ink-wells and paper for calligraphy and painting. In the evening, the neighborhood comes to life with many restaurants, bars, tea-houses and coffee-shops doing a roaring trade. My local friend took me to an old restaurant (dating back 100 years) housed in a charming wooden structure, containing many private rooms and serving authentic and traditional Korean cuisine. But most of the establishments here have a trendy and cosmopolitan appearance and ambience and most Westerners would feel quite at home here - I also have the impression that more English is spoken here than in many other parts of Seoul. After a very fine dinner and a strong cup of coffee in a cafe, my friend, always brimming with energy, suggested taking a taxi across town to south of the Han river to meet a friend in a karaoke bar. She told me that the area she wanted to take me to was more heavily expatriate, with accommodation, entertainment and other facilities catering to foreigners - I don’t suppose there would be any kind of a language problem there. Would that be the Seoul equivalent of Lan Kwai Fong in Hong Kong, I wondered? I was too weary to find out, since, by that time, my jet-lag was beginning to catch up with me, and I offered my apologies. Namdaemun
Does Seoul have its distinctive character? There is no getting away from the fact that invasion and occupation by the Japanese have left their mark on Korea’s capital city. The City Hall, situated right in the heart of downtown, is a copy of the Diet Building in Tokyo, a product of the Japanese occupation between 1910 and 1945. Seoul Station appears to be a building along the same lines. Just wandering around in the affluent and modern downtown area, say, along the premier shopping street, Myongdong, one senses in the layout of the streets, the design of the street signs and subway stations, and in the overall conception and appearance of the urban environment, something powerfully reminiscent of central Tokyo. Equally, the subway system is extensive, clean and well-run, and a pleasure to use. And one cannot help thinking that the Japanese influence has something to do with this. The department store culture so totally embraced by the Japanese in the tradition of Mitsukoshi or Matsuya has found faithful expression in Seoul - in the Lotte Department Store with its full range of services as well as products, and several restaurants offering cheap food. In a more subtle way, the care and meticulousness with which, say, the restaurant staff in my hotel wrap a lunch box , certainly suggest a Japanese kind of perfectionism. On entering Seoul’s Shilla Hotel, reputed to be the biggest and the best, I heard someone speaking through a loud-speaker issuing what seemed to be directions to motorists to make sure they took the correct driveway into the hotel. That is Japanese-style efficiency and organization - relatively rare in Asia. For a Chinese visiting the palaces and major cultural sights in Seoul, there is a palpable sense of cultural kinship with things Korean. Seoul’s palaces have derived much of their layout and design concepts from Chinese palaces. Moreover, since the ancient Korean writing system was in fact Chinese, the names of palace buildings and the inscriptions and couplets are all in Chinese as well, not to mention the fact that the words evoke the same Confucian concepts of good governance and moral rectitude shared by East Asian countries for many centuries. But that is as far as it goes. Kyongbok Palace has several features that seem to have no antecedents or parallels in China. Changdok Palace’s free-standing chimneys are indeed unique and the Korean king’s idea of building a non-royal mansion to experience life as an ordinary person, is not one that appears to have caught on at any time among emperors in China. Korean food is certainly distinct from both Chinese and Japanese food, and one cannot help noticing that in the streets of Seoul, almost all the cars are made in Korea, and foreign imports are almost not to be seen, particularly not Japanese ones, in sharp contrast to the situation in many other countries in Asia. As for the writing system, a Korean script, known as Hangul, was introduced by King Sejong in the 15th Century, and gradually evolved and took root in Korea to become the modern Korean writing system used today. One of the most striking and poignant examples of Korean ingenuity and national resolve was of course the “turtle ships” invented by Admiral Yi Sun-shin of the 16th Century who encased his wooden warships in sheets of armor and won important sea battles against the otherwise militarily superior armadas of Japan’s Hideyoshi. A bronze statue of Admiral Yi stands on a major downtown thoroughfare as eloquent testimony to the patriotism and courage of the Korean people. In fact, Seoul, as the heart and soul of the Korean nation, is where we can see most clearly and unmistakably, the centuries-old struggle by this great people to preserve and assert their uniqueness and cultural individuality in the face of strong influences from China and outright aggression by Japan. Jeffrey Tao November 1999 |